Sunday, July 27, 2008

THE HOLY WORD - in the Indian Understanding !

THE WORD

Vac

The Word, imperishable, is the Firstborn
of Truth, mother of the Veda and hub of
immortality. May she come to us in
happiness in the sacrifice! May she,
our protecting Goddess, be easy of
entreaty!

TB II, 8, 8, 5

The Person cannot be alone, not merely or mainly on the psychological level but on the constitutive level, that is, the level on which he can be what he is. Being is in fact never alone; it always has its own accompaniment, its shadow, so to speak (really and truly "so to speak"), for this is vac, the Word, the Firstborn. Now, to discover one's own shadow, one's own self, is a terrifying experience; it involves, to begin with, the loss of the original solitude and thus also of the primogenital innocence. The very fact of Being implies Being-with-itself, the principle of reflection, the real beginning: manas, the mind, was there at the beginning, the Shatapatha Brahmana will affirm, qualifying the cryptic verses of the Rig Veda. The shadow has been discovered as the (own) image, the icon.

The Vedic Revelation tells us in innumerable texts that vac, the Word is not just a man-made invention or a mere tool of communication, or even simply an expression of what Man is. The Vedic Word is indeed this, but is infinitely more. It is ultimately as important as Brahman and, in a way that has to be properly understood, it is Brahman itself, not as every being "is" ultimately Brahman, but in a special manner: the Word is the first offspring of the Absolute and sprang from it in a peculiar way.28 In the last analysis God has no name because He himself is Word.

According to Vedic Revelation, vac, which was at the beginning, cannot be reduced to a single one of its dimensions. To begin with, thought and language are here so intermingled that no separation is possible. Vac is grammatically feminine29 and this fact has conditioned a great deal of thinking about the Vedic Word. If an ontology of sex has any meaning at all, it would find here a decisive basis. However that may be, vac expresses that total surrender to the source from which it springs which is characteristically found in the archetype of feminine love, the feminine feature of love being that of finding not only fulfillment but being itself in the beloved.

It would be inadequate to describe vac exclusively as the principle of intelligibility of the universe, because she is equally the principle of pure affirmation emerging out of sheer nothingness.30 Vac is really the total living Word, that is to say, the Word in her entirety, including her material aspects, her cosmic reverberation, her visible form, her sound, her meaning, her message. Vac is more than merely meaning or sound devoid of sense; she is more than just an image or simply a vehicle of certain spiritual truths. She does not contain revelation; she is revelation. She was at the beginning. She is the whole of the shruti. The shruti is vac.

Vac, indeed, is the primordial mystery combining in herself the three worlds of time: past, present, and future. Everything that is participates in vac; through her everything has come into being and her imprint has been left everywhere. No wonder, then, that every word is sacred and thus powerful. If to throw a stone at a person may be a dangerous activity, to throw a word is much more so. A blessing or a curse does not work by magic; its efficacy depends upon whether you are conveying an empty sound (or an equally empty intention or a purely rational idea devoid of power) or rather a full and living reality. Only the Almighty is Lord of the Holy Word; only the Spirit has power over the Word and knows all words. It is not possible here to elaborate the many distinctions Indian speculation has built on the Word, to speak of shabda as sound and verbal testimony, of sphota as the eternal sound, and so on. We would like, however, to make one comment on the Word as prayer, which is more in tune with the purpose of this anthology.

It is a well-known fact that an epoch-making mutation took place, around the sixth century B.C., in India mainly through the reform movements of Buddha and Mahavira and the more orthodox renewal of the early Upanisads, and in other countries through parallel movements. The attention (as well as the intention) was now no longer being directed toward external sacrificial actions (karma-marga), but rather toward their interiorized acts. In this development the Word was the link between the religious way of life, based on sacrifice and other actions, and the subsequent spirituality, based on the inner meaning of those same actions and its expression in the words accompanying them. The decisive factor in any religious act was seen no longer in the actual performance of the action but in its intention expressed in the words. Similarly, later, the Word was also the link connecting the path of knowledge, the jnana-marga, with the path of devotion, the bhakti-marga. The accent here was not so much on the intellectual contents and gnostic power of the Word as on its emotional, sensitive, and concretely efficacious power of moving the will and elevating the whole being to the heights of the Divine.

In the context of the jnana-marga the mediatory aspect of vac is visible in the upadesha of the guru, that is, in his powerful word of instruction, capable of effecting realization in the disciple. In the context of the bhakti-marga, on the other hand, this mediatory character is found in the name of God, as the most powerful means of union with the divine. Here is the place of the nama-japa, or spiritual discipline of the repetition of the name of God.

In each instance the Word is the mediator. The Word, in point of fact, comprises an external action as well as an internal act or movement of the heart; the Word, one might say, has a soul as well as a body and a spirit. Not only are truth and untruth related to the Word, but also love and hate, action and inaction. From the perspective of the Vedic Revelation one would not hesitate to say that the Word is the embodiment of Man as well as of God. In the Word, whose function is both to conceal and to reveal, God and Man meet. It is the cosmotheandric reality par excellence.

The mediatory character of vac is manifested even in post-Vedic times, when the stress is upon the merely anthropological level. From the Upanisads onward one could say that the human components are considered to be prana, life or the breath of life (often replaced by the body, kaya), vac, here the speech or the word at large, and manas, the mind.31 It is significant that vac (standing here for all indriyas, sense organs)32 has in this context a mediatory function between the body and the mind. She shares, in point of fact, in the nature of both, being neither a merely bodily function or a purely spiritual organ. It is owing to this characteristic that vac plays so important a role in the spiritual ascent of Man, and that control and purity of speech are considered essential in almost all spiritualities.

It is also her mediatorial function that explains the importance of the Word in prayer. It is in this sense that the Word is prayer considered as Man's most authentic act, that is, as the act by which he reveals himself as he really is, and through which reality is revealed to him. So understood, every authentic word is prayer, and prayer is that act in which and by which Man enters into contact with the core of the real. Prayer, furthermore, is both active and passive, a giving and a receiving. Prayer in this sense is inseparable from the Word in the integral meaning given to it by the shruti.33 Every full word is a liturgical act.

Prayer, moreover, is the language of the Gods learned by Men. Yet Men know, as one text of the Brahmanas says,34 that when Men say "no" (neti) the Gods say "yes" (0m iti), and vice versa. Man cannot cease to be Man, even if he learns the ways of the Gods. What he may do is to integrate both languages, the yes and the no, into his own intuition. When the conflict between the two worlds is too acute he may prefer to keep silent. This silence is not the emptiness of a soundless vacuum, but rather the fullness of having to say complementary and conflicting words at the same time; the yes and the no, uttered together, produce the full silence of the unspoken word: the total and true word. When Man realizes that language, because it is bound by yes and no or by either-or, does not convey adequately his experience, he has to keep silence. Yet vac existed unspoken at the beginning and in the same way she will exist unspoken at the end. It is only in between that the Word speaks. The mediator is not absolute, but without such a mediator there could be no absolute. Out of the silence the Word sprang up35 and into the silence she will plunge again; meanwhile the world is made by the Word and, moreover, the second silence is not like the first one. Once the Word has become Cosmos, the Word cannot go back to her Source without the Cosmos accompanying her--as the later myths of Yudhisthira and Harishcandra so beautifully symbolize.

Revelation

Jnana

9 After the period of the Brahmanas the whole corpus of the Vedas is often designated by the name vac, the Word, meaning revelation. The Veda is neither "inspired" (having God as its author) nor "the Word of God" (containing or expressing the message of God); it is simply the primordial Word of whom no human being is the author: apauruseya, according to the doctrine elaborated by the Mimamsa with much scholarly detail and mental acuteness.36 This Word is nitya vac, the "eternal Word," according to a famous mantra.37

The present hymn to the sacred Word, known as a song to holy Wisdom, begins with an address to Brhaspati, "the Lord of the Holy Word," the inspirer of sacred poetry. What was the origin of this word? Where does speech come from? From the sages, the seers, who, expressing their own inner experience in words, communicated to mankind all that was best, purest, and most secret in their hearts. They gave a name to each single thing--a lengthy and laborious task. This revelation was motivated by love and achieved by collaboration with one another. Afterward they were able to express their purified thought in adequate words, as meticulous a task as that of sifting flour through a fine sieve (v. 2). The sages, it is said, found a bond of unity and friendship through this sacred work undertaken in common. The Word is here represented as the product of mediation, love and a common concern. The function of name-givingis in the last analysis a divine function and men can do no more than share in it, performing this creative activity on behalf of God. A sacred text tells us: "I know that Great Being who shines like the Sun beyond darkness, who delights in Understanding; who, having created things with their distinct forms and given them names, deals with them through those names that he has given."38

To call a thing by its own name is to be capable of discovering its most intimate structure, which is possible only if one participates in the act by which the thing comes into existence. It is for the father to give a name to the child, for the sage to designate an object, for the discoverer to label his discovery, for the lover to apostrophize his beloved, for God to name his creature. When we designate a being by its own name we symbolize the fact that we are dealing with that being through its own freedom, by entering into communication with its inmost structure. We do not command, we call (by name), and only the echo responds. We may note in passing that later philosophical speculation had much to say regarding the function of name-giving, which obviously cannot be equated with the mere act of labeling.

Once expressed, the Word is spread abroad (v. 3); it is the fundamental tool in the performance of sacrifice and it is associated, through sacrifice, with the salvation of Men. There is no salvation without a calling and an answer. The Word, thus, is used in the sacrifice not merely as an accidental instrument, but as a necessary one. It is the Word that, by virtue of its "atoning" function, unites heaven and earth.

Verse 4, continuing the vivid personification of verse 3, speaks of disloyalty to the Word when Men fail to hear and understand her. Yet the Word reveals herself only to certain ones. The others have eyes, indeed, but they have not beheld the Word; they have ears but they have not heard her. The communication of the Word is like the union of man and woman, for the Word comes and offers herself as a bride to her husband, to the one who is worthy to receive her. The Word is vitally connected with community and communication, and therefore those who are not faithful in friendship are excluded from participation in the Word, even if they are Brahmins and hence have a traditional right to "share in the holy Word" (vv. 6, 8). The Word is not a possession to be manipulated at will; on the contrary, one can be worthy of it only by constant attention and by "quickness of mind," degrees of which are here compared to ponds of differing depths (v. 7). Only those who possess a certain depth can really hear the Word; for the others it resembles a tree without flower or fruit (v. 5). This attention, moreover, demands an active collaboration and proper participation in the sacrifice, by means of which the strong thread will be woven that holds together all the threads of the universe (v. 9). Sacred competition forms part of the sacrifice (v. 10), and different roles reflecting the different aspects of the Word are assigned to those who concelebrate in it: the creation of poetry (corresponding to the Rig Veda with the hotr or offerer as priest), the melodious recitation of it bringing out all its inherent sound vibrations (the Sama Veda with the udgatr as the singer or celebrant), the exposition of its meaning and of the wisdom contained in it (the Atharva Veda with the brahman-priest), and its application in the sacrificial action (the Yajur Veda with the adhvaryu as the minister).39

Jnana

RV X, 71

1. O Lord of the Holy Word! That was the first
beginning of the Word when the Seers fell to naming each object.
That which was best and purest, deeply hidden
within their hearts, they revealed by the power of their love.
2. The Seers fashioned the Word by means of their mind,
sifting it as with sieves the corn is sifted.
Thus friends may recognize each other's friendship.
An auspicious seal upon their word is set.
3. They followed by sacrifice the path of the Word
and found her entered in among the Seers.
They led her forth and distributed her among many.
In unison the seven Singers chant her.
4. Yet certain ones, though seeing, may not see her,
and other ones, though hearing, may not hear her.
But to some the Word reveals herself quite freely,
like fair-robed bride surrendering to her husband.
5. One man they call morose, unbending in friendship;
him they do not send forward to competitions.
He goes on his way deluded, his endeavors sterile.
Void both of fruit and flowers was the word he heard.
6. No longer does the man who has abandoned
a congenial friend possess a share in the Word.
Vain is his hearing, whatsoever he hears.
He does not recognize the path of goodness.
7. Friends, though endowed alike with sight and hearing,
may yet in quickness of mind be quite unequal.
Some are like ponds that reach to mouth or shoulder,
while others resemble lakes deep enough for bathing.
8. When Brahmins sacrifice together in friendship,
forming within their hearts inspirations of the spirit,
their wise resolves may leave one man behind,
while others, though reckoned as Brahmins, stray away.
9. Those who advance not in this direction or that,
who are not knowers of Brahman or Soma-pressers,
they have obtained the Word in sinful fashion.
Being ignorant, they weave a faulty thread.
10. His comrades all rejoice when their friend returns
covered with glory, proclaimed victor in the assembly.
He frees them from their sin, provides them with food.
Prepared is he, fit for the competition.
11. One man with utmost care creates the verses;
another sings a song in chanted meters.
A third, the Brahmin, tells forth the wisdom of being,
while yet a fourth prescribes the rules of sacrifice.
1. Lord of the Holy Word: Brhaspati Cf. brh-, brahman as utterance. Cf. BU I, 3, 20.
2. Cf. TB II, 8, 8, 5 ( § I B Antiphon), for the idea that the Word is brought forth by the Sages.
3. The seven Singers may refer to the singers who accompany sacrifice with their chanting or perhaps to those same Sages from whom the Word took its origin. Certain commentators, however, see here a reference to the seven well-known Vedic meters, quoted in AV XIX, 21. Others see a reference to the seven stars of the Great Bear. The root dha- with the prefix vi may also be translated "to reveal" instead of "to distribute."
4. To hear and understand the Word is not an act of the will or of the intellect alone. The relationship between the Word and the hearer is a much more intimate one; it is a vital assimilation.
5. His endeavors sterile: adhenu, lit. without a milch cow.
The word he heard: vacam shushruvan, i.e., the knowledge he received is useless.
6. Share in the Word: cf. also RV I, 164, 37 (§ I 11).
7. In quickness of mind: manojavesu, in their intuitions.
9. This direction or that: lit. neither forward nor backward.
Faulty thread: siristantra; a word of doubtful meaning, it could also mean a "thread of water," referring to the useless enterprise of trying to "weave" a tissue out of water (cf. Geldner).
11. One man: the hotr
Another: the udgatr.
Chanted meters: shakvari, a kind of verse or meter.
A third: a Brahmin, a knower of Brahman.
A fourth: the adhvaryu.
Prescribes the rules. . . : yajnasya matram, or "he measures the sacrifice."

The Divine Word

Devi Sukta

10 This hymn, though the name vac does not appear in it, is the most magnificent chant to this feminine principle, the devi of the supreme power, which later on would be known under the name of shakti.

Vac was before all creation, preexisting before any being came to be. It was she who initiated the creative process. The first two stanzas require a total immersion into the Vedic world in order for their full meaning to be grasped. With a beauty of their own, they say in solemn cadences that the Word is not only the First of the whole Vedic pantheon, but that she has a unique place, for her nature is not to be compared with that of any other being, whether created or uncreated.

The Word is not only an integral part of the sacrifice; she is also the Queen who commands homage in every sphere and who, expressing herself under different forms, remains essentially the unique Word that preserves the unity of all worship. Vac is the lifegiving principle within all beings, even if they do not recognize this fact; she is the wind, the breath of life. She is the mother, attentive to the needs of both Gods and Men. She bestows her gifts and favors graciously and freely. She, existing from all eternity, reveals the Father and for the sake of creatures "begets" him who otherwise would remain utterly disconnected and nonexistent.

Devi Sukta

RV X, 125

1. I move with the Rudras and also with the Vasus,
I move with the Adityas and all the Gods.
I support both Mitra and Varuna,
Indra and Agni and the two Ashvins.
2. I uphold Soma the exuberant;
I uphold Tvastar, Pusan, and Bhaga.
I pour wealth on the offerer of oblation,
the worshiper and the pious presser of Soma.
3. I am the ruling Queen, the amasser of treasures,
full of wisdom, first of those worthy of worship.
In various places the divine powers have set me.
I enter many homes and take numerous forms.
4. The man who sees, who breathes, who hears words spoken,
obtains his nourishment through me alone.
Unrecognizing me, he yet dwells in me.
Listen, you who know! What I say is worthy of belief.
5. It is I myself who announce and utter the tidings
that Gods and men alike rejoice to hear.
The man I love I make increase in strength.
I make him a priest, a sage, or a learned seer.
6. It is I who draw the mighty bow of the God,
that an arrow may pierce the hater of the Holy Word.
Among the people I arouse the struggle
and I have permeated Earth and Heaven.
7. At the world's summit I bring forth the Father.
My origin is in the Waters, in the ocean.
Thence I am spread through all existing worlds
and even touch the heaven with my forehead.
8. I breathe out strongly like the wind while clasping
unto myself all worlds, all things that are.
I tower above the earth, above the heavens,
so mighty am I in my power and splendor!
1-2. See glossary for the meanings of the names of the Gods.
3. Cf. RV VIII, 100, 10; VIII, 101, 16.
The Word as the Firstborn has complete primacy over all.
The divine powers: devah.
The Word pervades everything and is also expressed in many forms and in many languages, all of which are forms of the one and only unique Word.
4. The power of the Word presupposes consciousness but not self-consciousness. The Word has a power of its own, though not necessarily a magic power.
The literal translation of l. 4 is: "Listen, you who know, I tell you what is to be heard with faith," or "Hear, you that are [yourself] heard [by me]."
5. Priest: brahman.
It is the Word that favors men and has the initiative.
6. The God: Rudra.
The third line is conjectural.
Line 4. The whole cosmos is not only a "fruit" of the Word but it is also "steeped" in her.
7. Some would prefer to say in line 1 that the Word "inspires" or "impels," instead of "begets," the cosmic and divine Father. It could also be said that she reveals the Father and declares what He is. The theme of reversible parenthood, on the other hand, is well known in Vedic culture. It is even on occasion the son who saves the father, though this idea may be related to the later conception of samsara.
Origin: yoni, womb.
For the Waters, cf. RV X, 129, 3 (§ I 1 and notes).
8. Again the theme of the immanence and transcendence of the Word.

Sharing in the Word

Vaco bhagam

11Few texts provide a deeper insight into the cosmic mystery of the Word than the following few stanzas taken from a long poem full of riddles and extraordinary statements. The Word is the central mystery that is situated in the very core of reality; the Word is the soul, the vital principle of every being, although not every creature can listen and, much less, understand the total sum of words. It is only the Maker of the universe who knows all words: the Word herself. Our field of experience is reduced to one fourth and we realize, as we become more and more aware of this limitation, that even the fourth part is not completely intelligible to us. The Word is not only speech, though constitutively connected with it; it is also intellibility, the principle of reason, the power of the intellect, the rational structure of reality.

Stanzas 34 and 35 contain the four classic questions found in practically all traditions of the world. In the language of the Vedas these four riddles of the universe are:

What is the furthest limit of the earth,
the center of the world,
the seed of the horse, and
the highest heaven of the Word?

This symbolic language is investigating:

The boundaries of our existence, its extreme limits; the core of the whole creation, its energy and dynamism; the mystery of life, especially of human life; and the all-encompassing spiritual reality that embraces not only the created world but also transcendent reality, that is, the mystery of the Spirit.

The answers are extremely concise:

The altar of sacrifice is the "limit'' of the human condition. Man cannot go further than the altar where all his humanness is concentrated. Any theory about the nature of the altar has to start from this anthropological insight. The "furthest limit" is thus the altar, where the Spirit, Man, and Matter meet, that is, the divine, the human, and the material or adhidaivika, adhyatmika and adhibhautika.

Sacrifice is the center of the world, its force, that which gives it the strength to be, to be what it is and what it shall be, that which supports the cosmos and maintains it in existence. Sacrifice is not primarily a human affair but a cosmic venture, and God and the Gods are the prime actors in it. Sacrifice is not only the creative act; it is also both the conservational and the actively transforming act of the whole universe. The second question is the cosmological question.

The origin of life resides in Soma, the life-principle. It is the principle of fecundation, of love, and of every form of vital activity. The third question is the psychological or biological question.

The origin and place, the locus, of the Word is prayer, the sacred formula, the brahmana priest or Brahman, the spirit. The Word is not only sound, not only idea and intelligibility; it is also action, spirit, the unique Word permeating everything. This is the right and the deepest theological or philosophical question. Metaphysics and linguistic analysis meet in vac.

We would diminish, however, the power of this enigma if we were to understand it in an abstract and generalized manner. In response to the query of verse 34, the poem affirms that this altar is the furthest limit of the earth; this sacrifice of ours is the world's center; this Soma we offer here and now is the vital seed, the semen of life; this word we utter as we make this offering is the highest heaven, the metaphysial location of the Spirit. In each sacrificial act, in each liturgical performance, we are at the very center of space and time, at the navel of the universe, in the very heart of Being. To the centrifugal dispersion of a schizophrenic existence real wisdom, that is to say, the knowledge of the Word, opposes a centripetal dynamism toward the center of all things.

The motto of our anthology, a most astonishing quatrain which has been considered as describing the poetic and divine inspiration of the rishi and which can be said to articulate indeed in a profound way the specific human condition with its grandeur and its misery at the same time, is: "What is this that I am, I do not know." Man is a riddle to himself; he is a mystery he cannot decipher. Man is an "I am," he is a spark of being, he is real, but he does not know who he is because the very faculty he is endowed with, the very power he has, his mind, is what reveals to him that he is and conceals from him who he is. It is by his mind that Man wanders about; it is by his mind that Man recognizes his human condition and that he is free because he knows that he is; but that very mind is for him a burden, almost a prison in which he is secluded. He cannot fly beyond, because it is his own mind that makes the space available and sets the limits to his own incursion into reality; the mind is the organ he has in order to discover reality and even to be real. This is the first distich. Man is because he thinks, and he is because he thinks to be. No pretension is possible here. Thinking and being are not identical, but they are so intrinsically correlated that in Man there is not the one without the other. Man cannot escape the "space" of his own consciousness or transcend the "time" of his own being.

This is perhaps hinted at in the particular Vedic symbolism of this hymn:

Below the realm above,
above the realm below
the Cow has risen,
leading her calf.
Where has she turned?
To which side has she departed?
Where does she give birth?
For she is not in the herd.40

Here the Cow is the Dawn carrying her rays, all symbolizing the power of human consciousness.

And yet the second distich discloses to us that there is something that does not come from Man as involution, evolution, or development, but falls upon him and hits him as a revolution, revelation, and surprise. It is the mystery of the Word which makes Man aware that he is primarily a spoken rather than a speaking reality, a spoken rather than a speaking Word, a receiver rather than a giver, created rather than creator. Man goes around heaven and earth; he wanders in search of what he does not know, of himself, of his Self, of the Self. At a certain moment he meets what was most close to him: the Word; he discovers his world, he realizes that he is in the world, he approaches the Firstborn of Truth, as the parallel text we are commenting upon tells us.41 He shares then in immortality, in wisdom, in knowledge; he simply picks up the fruit of the tree of life as a bird eats the ripe fruits from the top of an earthly tree.42

The Truth, whose Firstborn is the Word, is not a mere static truth or a sheer moral truthfulness; it is the dynamic order of the entire reality, the primordial activity out of which everything comes to be; it is rita. The first offspring of it is the Word. When the Word overshadows Man, when it dawns upon him, then Man shares in the Word, participates in the speaking structure of the universe, and enters into the dialogical reality; then he can listen, speak, command; he becomes Man when the sounds he emits become words. Man is Word shared, according to this Vedic stanza. Man is by participation in the Word.43

The following stanza (v. 38), here omitted, speaks of the sun and/or the spirit marching backward and forward and introduces the thought tlut the mortal and the immortal, though of the same origin, move in opposite directions, so that he who sees the one does not perceive the other. An Upanisadic idea is here insinuated. He who sees the perishable element in the total dynamism of the world is blind to the immortal one and vice versa.

The next text, which is also the Antiphon of the General Introduction, says, first of of all, that without the knowledge of the aksara brahman, the Imperishable, the Spirit, the entire literal cognizance of all the samhitas is of no avail whatsoever. It formulates the basic hermeneutical principle, that without possessing the key to understanding a text the text remains a dead letter, and it affirms that this key is the eternal, the indestructible Spirit that gives us real understanding of the Scriptures.

In our context, however, this stanza conveys still another, though related, message. It says that the entire gist of the Vedas lies in one syllable, in the unalterable and thus eternal sound. The insight that language is given with consciousness accounts for the conviction that the elements of language, that is, the syllables, are considered the indestructible bricks out of which the intelligible world is made. Aksara, in fact, means both "imperishable" and "syllable." Now, the immutable rc is here the simplest and the fontal rc par excellence. It is the syllable contained in all the words; it is the soul of every word, as it were. It is the primal sound which, sounded at the beginning, resounds in every portion of the Vedas, which are nothing but echoes of this syllable. The pranava, or sacred syllable om, is not explicitly mentioned, but it is adumbrated.

Our text tells us that only he who has reached this transcending wisdom, which is as simple as a syllable, sits in peace and communion with Gods, Men, and all beings. The knowledge of the true word makes us reach understanding and harmony; it creates the authentic communion with all beings. The last stanza given here introduces an intuition concerning vac which had far-reaching repercussions in later philosophical and religious schools, specially in Saivism. It asserts that there is a fourfold division of the Word parallel to th: division of purusa, the primordial Man. In both instances the symbolism of the number four expresses cosmic completeness, though at the same time it is stressed that such fullness is not accessible to Man in his earthbound state. As the verse quoted just before (37) says, even the seer, who has a more than normal insight into reality, obtains only "a share of the Word." Man has a certain consciousness of the Word's totality, but he cannot grasp the whole; he can only grasp a portion of it. This revealed and spoken portion is only one quarter, one foot out of four (the four feet expressing stability and wholeness). Later speculations on the subject say that the first and highest (para) dimension of vac is transcendent and thus inaccessible; the second is illuminated (pashyanti, the seeing one) but is still on a transcendental plane; the third, the middle one (madhyama), consists of purely mental articulation; the fourth is the intoned word (vaikhari), the external expression of vac, that is, human language in the usual sense.

The four parts of speech have elsewhere been interpreted very differently. The Shatapatha Brahmana (IV, 1, 3, 16) says: "Only one fourth of the Word shall I speak intelligibly, if they have given me only a fourth each time for my portion. Hence only one fourth of speech, which is that of Men, is intelligible. The fourth that beasts speak is not intelligible. The fourth that birds speak is not intelligible." And the following stanza quotes our particular text. The Taittiriya Upanisad I, 5, 1-5 and the Maitri Upanisad VI, 6 also offer speculation on the four utterances.

This text is also related to the purusha in Rig Veda X, 90, 3-4 and belongs to the same fundamental myth that is expressed in the Mandukya Upanisad. The Taittiriya Brahmana, II, 8, 8, 5 and the Rig Veda VIII, 100, 11 are also enlightening in this point.

Vaco bhagam

RV I, 164, 34-35; 37; 39; 45

34. I ask you about the furthest limit of earth;
Where, I ask, is the center of the world?
I ask you about the Stallion's prolific seed;
I ask you about high heaven where abides the Word.
35. The altar is the furthest limit of earth;
this sacrifice of ours is the world's center;
the Soma is the Stallion's prolific seed;
our prayer is the highest heaven where abides the Word.
37. What thing I am I do not know.
I wander secluded, burdened by my mind.
When the Firstbom of Truth has come to me
I receive a share in that selfsame Word.
39. He who knows not the Veda's eternal Syllable,
that highest point on which dwell all the Gods,
what has he to do with the Veda?
Only those who know it sit here in peaceful assembly.
45. The Word is measured in four quarters. The wise
who possess insight know these four divisions.
Three quarters, concealed in secret, cause no movement.
The fourth is the quarter that is spoken by Men
34. Earth: prthivi.
The center: nabhi, lit. the navel.
The world: bhuvana, the cosmos, existent things.
The Stallion's seed stands for the essence of virility.
35. Cf. YV XXIII, 62, for the same stanza.
The altar: vedi, the place of the sacrifice.
This sacrifice: yajna.
Center: nabhi , navel. Cf. § III B Antiphon.
The highest heaven: parama vyoman, the purest state (of anything).
Cf. also in relation to vac this same hymn (RV I, 164, 41). Vac and manas form a divine unity. Cf. AB V, 25 (XXIV, 6); BU I, 2, 4 (§ I 14). Prana and vac also form this same union (maithuna). Cf. SB I, 4, 1, 2. After all, vac is the very glory and splendor of Prajapati; cf. SB II, 2, 4, 4. For the relation between vac and Prajapati, cf. also SB V, 1, 5, 6; VI, 1, 1, 9; XIII, 4, 1, 15. Vac is also called paramestini vac in AV XIX, 9, 3 (§ II 38).
Prayer: lit. brahman-priest, though the emphasis here is on the holy utterance.
37. Secluded: ninya, inward, secret, hidden. Perhaps an allusion to the retired life of a forest dweller (Vanaprastha).
Samnaddho manasa means "bound by" and also "bound to" my mind, the mind that is my only instrument and does not give me the clear vision for which I am longing.
39. Eternal Syllable: aksara; imperishable, immutable, and thus the elements of a word, a syllable, and perhaps here the pranava or mystical syllable om (cf. VI 12). Philologists would translate either way; commentators would understand the syllable to be om . We have brought the two currents together.
Highest point: parama vyoman, highest heaven, place; cf. v. 35.
Vedas: rc.
Sit here in peaceful assembly: samaste, from sam-as, to sit together in assembly, deliberating.
45. The wise: bramanah, the Brahmins, "wise men."
Quarter: pada, originally meaning "footprint," is the technical term to designate the fourth part of a Rig-Vedic mantra. It means a part that symbolizes the whole.

BIBLICAL UNDERSTANDING

John 1

The Word Became Flesh
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning.

3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4In him was life, and that life was the light of men. 5The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood[a] it.

6There came a man who was sent from God; his name was John. 7He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all men might believe. 8He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light. 9The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.[b]

10He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13children born not of natural descent,[c] nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

14The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[d] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

15John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, "This was he of whom I said, 'He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.' " 16From the fullness of his grace we have all received one blessing after another. 17For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only,[e][f]who is at the Father's side, has made him known.


The Knowledge of the Sacred Word

Brahmavidya

12 Brahman, as both word and concept, contains a profound ambiguity which tends to irritate those who approach the Vedas with an exclusively rational curiosity. Brahman is not only everything and nothing; it is also the highest and the lowest and that which lies in between, prayer, the effusion of the Spirit and the Spirit itself, the sacred formula, its meaning, and its ultimate intention. This hymn tries to portray the unity that nevertheless underlies Brahman. This unity constitutes the mystery of vac, the sacred Word.

The first verse recalls the origins of the Word, here Brahman, which is firmly and indissolubly linked with sacrifice and which makes and sustains the world. It says that the Word "was born in the East," for it is toward the East as the symbol of the origins that the sacrificial rite is performed. The seer, or sage, who discovered the Word penetrated to such an ineffable depth of contemplation that he saw in the Word the matrix of both Being and Nonbeing.

In verse 2 the same Word, now called vac, is seen in its feminine and thus cosmic aspect, the Word that was already in existence at the primordial creation, the all-powerful queen who truly reigns because she dwells within all beings.

In verse 3 the Word is boldly identified with the connecting link that imparts life to all beings and unites them with one another, the metaontic undercurrent that imparts harmony to the entire universe and in the already quoted text44 is considered to have its ground in Nonbeing rather than in Being. By a sort of two-way relationship the Supreme Principle is said to have drawn forth the Word from the bosom of the Word; the Word is not other than her Source: the Father and the Daughter are one and yet He has begotten Her.

Verse 4 recalls to our minds the support of the universe, the skambha who, while dwelling simultaneously in heaven and on earth, upholds them both and keeps them separate. Cosmic Order is neither created nor uncreated. It is not created, for if it were it could not reside in God; nor is it uncreated, for in that event the Supreme and rita would be identical and there would be no freedom or room for decision in the Ultimate.

Verse 5 contains a profound and enigmatic note: the poet invokes Brhaspati, the Lord of the Sacred Word, "born from nothingness but ascended on high," as the supreme and ultimate divinity.

The latter half of this verse and the following two verses extol the power and wisdom of the poet-sage as being so great that he even enhances the lustre of the "ancient God" (the Sun?). He alone among those born on earth is wakeful before the Sun rises (v. 6). Verse 7 shows in a similar way the power of the priest, "friend of the Gods," of whom Atharvan and Brhaspati are, respectively, the human and divine prototypes. Through the mediatorship of the priest Man can rise up from his earthly condition and attain divine freedom.

The hymn could be summed up in the following way:

May the Sages, who first discovered the Word, who, after meditating upon it long and silently in their hearts and spirits, were illumined in their own inner beings and succeeded in communicating and pronouncing that same Word to their fellowmen--may they themselves shine with lustrous splendor!

Brahmavidya

AV IV, 1

1. That Sacred Word which was first born in the East
the Seer has revealed from the shining horizon.
He disclosed its varied aspects, high and low,
the womb of both the Existent and the Nonexistent.
2. May this ancestral Queen who dwells among beings
stride forth toward primordial creation!
I have conveyed to her this shining Sunbird.
Let them offer warm milk to the one who is thirsty for worship.
3. The wise who knows from birth this world's hidden thread
discerns the coming to birth of all the Gods.
From the bosom of the Sacred Word he brought forth the Word.
On high, below, he abides in his own laws.
4. Abiding by Cosmic Order, he fixed as his seat
the mighty firmaments of Heaven and Earth.
Mighty from birth, dwelling in earth and heaven,
he fixed those mighty masses, defining their spheres.
5. From birth at depths abysmal the Sacred Word
has passed up to the summit; the cosmic ruler,
the Lord of the Sacred Word, is her divinity.
Just as the luminous day is born from light,
so may the radiant singers shine far and wide!
6. Truly the Poet's wisdom enhances the glory
of the Ordinance decreed by God the powerful, the ancient.
He was born here together with many; they
were found sleeping when the Eastern hemisphere was opened.
7. Whoever you are who approach Atharvan our father
and Brhaspati, the friend of the Gods, with reverence,
you shall become the creator of all that is,
a sage, a God, invulnerable, self-dependent.
1. That Sacred Word: brahman. Cf. AV X, 2, 71-33; cf also the two hymns to skambha, AV X, 7 and 8 (§§ I 3, VII 27), for this conception of brahman as the Holy utterance.
The Seer: Vena Cf. AV II, 1, l ( § VI 1 Introduction).
Womb: yoni.
Existent. . . Nonexistent: sad. . . asat. Cf. RV X, 129, 1 (§ I 1 and notes).
2. There is a significant transition from brahman to vac , who is here regarded as a queen and is the subject of the following verses. Cf., e.g., X, 125, 3 (§ I 10).
Sunbird : hamsa the mythical bird of Vedic lore.
The boiling (warm) milk is in accordance with a prescribed sacrificial rite.
3. Hidden thread: bandhu, connection; cf AV II,1, 3; RV X, 129, 4 (§ I 1).
Bosom: yoni.
Sacred Word : brahman
4. Cosmic Order: rita.
5. The Lord of the Sacred Word: Brhaspati.
Connecting vv. 1 and 2 with 3 and 4, and recalling the already quoted RV X, 71, 1-29 (§ I 9), we may venture to interpret this obscure text as describing the origin of the Word in the depths of the human spirit. The Word proceeds from an unformed and unconscious state up to one of full manifestation and finally, to the recognition of Brhaspati (Brahmanaspati) as her Lord. Cf. BU, I, 3, 20-21.
6. Poet's wisdom: kavya.
Enhances: the root is hi-, to further, to increase, to love, to glorify, to praise.
Ordinance: dhaman, also abode.
Born. . . together with many: the commentary assumes that sunrays are meant.
7. Atharvan: he is father inasmuch as he was the first priest in ancient times to discover fire.
Friend of the Gods: devabandhu.

The Origin of the Word

Vagvisarga

13Vac is truly "the womb of the universe."45 For "by that Word of his, by that Self, he created all this, whatever there is."46 The Brahmanas are fascinated, one might almost say obsessed, by the position and function of the Word. They are never far from ascribing to it a magic power and on occasion they virtually do so, but their underlying intuition is of something greater than magic, for they are testifying to the unique character of the Word and its equally unique mediatorial function. The Word belongs to both worlds, the created and the uncreated; the Word is needed for sacrifice, because sacrifice is the Word. Vac and manas, Word and mind, go together, though at times not without a certain strain. A significant tale is told concerning the relative merits of mind and speech. As each claimed superiority they had recourse to Prajapati, who declared that mind is better than speech because the word or speech can only imitate and follow that which the mind has already conceived (iv).47 The main themes of Upanisadic culture as well as certain characteristics of the Vedantic world view could be said to stem from this emphasis on the primacy of the spirit over language. Throughout the Brahmanas we find a certain ambivalence as the texts oscillate between two extremes, sometimes identifying vac with Prajapati48 and sometimes considering the Word as a mere instrument, subordinate not only to manas but also to certain other fundamental concepts that constantly reappear in the Brahmanas. The ambiguity is not resolved. There are, however, various texts that introduce us in striking fashion to the power of the Word and its unique character. The fact that vac is feminine is especially significant in the Brahmanas. She is supreme, but in a very feminine way; she is queen, but she has a king as partner, for she is the consort of Prajapati, the Creator. She has a feminine characteristic of complementarity, a mediatorial role, and a certain feminine docility and obedience. She needs always to be uttered, by men, by Gods, or by the Creator himself. This element of submission is responsible, however, for her decline. She gradually loses her primordial supremacy until she is defeated by manas in the Brahmanas and plays a secondary role in the Upanisads.49

Vagvisarga

TMB XX, 14, 2

i) This, [in the beginning], was only the Lord of the universe. His word was with him. This word was his second. He contemplated. He said, "I will deliver this Word so that she will produce and bring into being all this world."

TB II, 8, 8, 4

ii) The Word is infinite, immense, beyond all this. . . . All the Gods, the celestial spirits, men and animals, live in the Word. In the Word all the worlds find their support.

SB I, 4, 4, 1

iii) That same fire, then, that one kindles, thinking: in this fire, when kindled, we will sacrifice to the Gods--in this fire, therefore, one first makes two oblations: to Mind and to Word, for Mind and Word, when yoked together, convey the sacrifice to the Gods.

SB I, 4, 5, 8-12

iv) 8. Now once there was a dispute between the Mind and the Word. "I am excellent," said the Mind, and the Word said, "I am excellent."
9. The Mind said: "I am certainly better than you, because you do not utter anything that is not previously understood by me. So, as you just imitate what I am doing and simply follow me, I am certainly better than you."
10. The Word said: "I am certainly better than you, because whatever you know, I make it known, I communicate it."
11. They went to Prajapati, asking for his decision. Prajapati spoke in favor of the Mind, saying [to the Word]: "the Mind is certainly better, because you only imitate and follow what the Mind is doing; and he who is imitating and following what another does is undoubtedly inferior."
12. As the Word was thus refuted, she became ashamed and miscarried. The Word spoke to Prajapati: "I shall never become the carrier of your oblation, I whom you have refuted!" Therefore, whatever in the sacrifice is performed for Prajapati is done in a low voice, because the Word refused to carry the oblation to Prajapati.

SB X, 5, 3, 1-5

v) 1. In the beginning this universe was neither Being nor Nonbeing. In the beginning, indeed, this universe existed and did not exist: only Mind was there.
2. . . . This Mind was, so to speak, neither existent nor nonexistent.
3. This Mind, once created, desired to become manifest. . . .
4. That Mind then created the Word. This Word, when created, desired to become manifest, more conspicuous, more physical. It sought after a self. It practiced fervid concentration. It acquired a substance. It was the thirty-six thousand fires of its own self, made of the Word, built up of the Word. . . with the Word they chanted and with the Word they recited. Whatever rite is performed at the sacrifice, whatever sacrificial rite exists, is performed by the Word alone, as a vocal performance, on fires composed of Word, built up by Word. . . .
5. That Word created the Life Breath.
i) Cf similar texts in § I 6.
ii) Cf. the continuation of this text in the antiphon of § I B.
iii) The indispensable role of both Word and Mind is one of the cornerstones of the concept of worship, from the Vedic sacrifice down to contemporary forms of puja
iv) Cf. TS II, 5, 11, 4.
8. Spirit: manas, mind.
Word: vac, speech.
10. I make it known: vijnapayami, I reveal it.
12. In a low voice: upamshu, the "middle way" of recitation at the sacrifice, the other two being nirukta (clearly pronounced) and tusnim (silent).
v) This text relies on RV X, 129, 1 (§ I 1) and develops the idea of the Word taking its origin from the Mind, the breath from the Word, and thus successively: eye, ear, work, fire.
On manas, vac, and prana and their homologization with the Vedas cf., e.g., BU I, 5, 5.
4. More conspicuous: niruktatara, more pronounced, explicit.
More physical: murtatara, more formed, incarnate. Mind and Word are the two essential elements of worship (cf. the later namarupa, etc.).

The Interior Word

Manovac

14The Word, the primordial principle at the origin of every thing, has many dimensions, as we have already indicated. Almost all of them are summed up in the liturgical Word as it is understood in the Vedas and Brahmanas. The Upanisads add depth to the same vision, but their different language represents also a deep ontological change: the liturgical Word can be called, according to tradition and to etymology, Brahman. The Upanisads put emphasis on Brahman and relegate vac to the performance of the other functions of the Word, though without making a clear-cut distinction.

The first cleavage of that which is one 50 can be seen in the Rig Veda, where in one verse vac is both the subject of speech ("the Word speaks," i.e., "revelation") and the object of speech ("the word is spoken by all kinds of beings," i.e., language). In the first instance she is also the Queen of the Gods; in the second she is produced by the Gods.51

The attention of the Upanisads is directed more toward the realization of the individual and the interiorization of external actions. In consequence the revelational, liturgical, and cosmological aspect of vac loses momentum. Generally vac is counted among the human organs (indriya), and her status varies, although at times her importance is rediscovered, as, for instance, when she is ranked next to atman, which on an interiorized level corresponds to the purusa or Prajapati of the Samhitas and Brahmanas. As the general tendency of the Upanisads, however, is toward the unconditioned knowledge of atman as the knower and not the known, the seer and not the seen, any type of mediation is to be refused--the mediation of the sacrifice and also therefore of the liturgical Word of Revelation. While the Vedic rishis were overwhelmed by the power of the Word, the Upanisadic sages enquired whose is this Word; and so they were directed not only to the speaker, but even beyond him to the Self, which inspires all speech from within, the antaryamin the Immortal, as one of the texts affirms. Speech cannot know its own source of inspiration, just as the body cannot know its life-giving principle, the soul. And yet speech is one of the nearest "bodies," that is, embodiments or manifestations, of the inmost Self, as the same text suggests.

Since the final word of the Upanisads is neti, neti, "not this, not this,"52 the Absolute can only be designated as tad avacyam, "the unspeakable,"53 that to which vac cannot be applied and from which any word recoils.54 Even this world was, at the beginning, unspoken, unuttered, as one Upanisad says.55

The fact should be kept in mind, nevertheless, that the concept of Brahman arose out of that very horizon of sacred speech and liturgy which we have been describing. Without it the whole religious and mystical fervor of the Upanisads could not have come into being; even that which must be transcended, has first to be.

Manovac

AU Invocation

i) May my word be firmly established in my mind!
May my mind be firmly established in my word!
O Self-manifest one, be manifest to me!
Be for me the cornerstone of Revelation.
May what I have heard not depart from me!
Thus meditating on your wisdom I link nights and days.
I will speak the Right.
I will speak the Truth.
May that protect me!
May it protect my teacher!
Yes, let it protect me
and protect my teacher!
May that protect him!
Om! Peace, peace, peace!

BU I, 2, 4-6

ii) 4. He yearned that a second self might be born to him. He [Death or Hunger] united with the Word by means of the Spirit. In this union the seed became the year, for prior to this there was no year. He bore him for that much time--a year--and after that he brought him forth. When he was born he [Death] opened his mouth to swallow him up. He [the Newborn] cried out bhan! And that became the Word.
5. He pondered by himself: If I destroy him, I shall have less food for myself. Accordingly, with that Word, with that Self, he brought forth this whole universe, everything that exists. . . .
6. He longed to sacrifice again with a still greater sacrifice.

BU III, 7, 17

iii) He who dwells in speech, who is different from and interior to speech, whom speech does not know, whose body is speech, who inspires speech from within, he is the Self, the Inner Inspirer, the Immortal.

BU III, 9, 24-25

iv) 24. "Which is the divinity in the zenith?"
"The divinity Fire."
"In what is this fire established?"
"In speech."
"In what is speech established?"
"In the heart."
"In what is the heart established?"
25. "You absurd man!" said Yajnavalkya, "how can you think that it is anywhere else than in ourselves? If it were to be found in anything else, the dogs might eat it or the birds might tear it to pieces!"

CU III, 18, 3

v) The Word is one quarter of Brahman. It shines and gives warmth with the light of fire. He who knows this shines and gives warmth with glory, with praise, and with Brahman-splendor.

CU VII, 2, 1

vi) The Word verily is greater than name. The Word in fact makes known the Rig Veda, the Yajur Veda, the Sama Veda, the Atharva Veda as the fourth, the Ancient Lore as the fifth [Veda], the Veda of Vedas, the ritual for ancestors, calculus, the augural sciences, the knowledge of the signs of the times, dialectics, ethics, political science, sacred knowledge, theology, knowledge of the spirits, military science, astrology, the science of snakes and of celestial beings. [The Word also makes known] heaven, earth, wind, space, the waters, fire, the Gods, Men, animals, birds, grass, and trees, all animals down to worms, insects, and ants. [It also makes known] what is right and wrong, truth and untruth, good and evil, what is pleasing and what is unpleasing. Verily, if there were no Word, there would be knowledge neither of right and wrong, nor of truth and untruth, nor good and evil, nor of the pleasing and unpleasing. The Word makes all this known. Meditate on the Word.
i) This invocation is traditionally chanted by the student at the beginning of every session of study. It belongs to any Upanisad of the Rig Veda.
Word: vac; it could also be translated here by "speech."
Firmly established: pratishthita, well fixed, firm.
Mind: manas.
O Self-manifest one, be manifest to me: avir avir ma edhi.
Revelation: veda.
The Right: rita could equally well be rendered here by "the real," as also could satya, truth.
Teacher: vaktr, the speaker or he who instructs.
The first two lines could also read: May my speech rest on my spirit! May my spirit rest on my speech!
ii) 4. Cf. SB 1, 4, 4, 1 (§ I 13); X, 6, 5, 5.
The One is called here Hunger and/or Death; cf. § I 7 notes.
Spirit: manas
This union: maithuna, i.e., the copulation between manas and vac
iii) 1-16. Cf. § VI 5.
Speech: vac, word.
Different from and interior to: antara.
Body: sharira, stands here for the external manifestation of the atman, or, in other words, for its symbol. Cf. the other terms in this series, BU III, 7, 3-23 (§ VI 5).
Inner Inspirer: antaryamin, inner controller, inner ruler. Cf. § I C Introduction, note 56.
18-23. Cf. § VI 5.
iv) 1-9. Cf. § VI 2.
10-17. Cf. § VI 7.
21. Cf. § I 37.
24. Fire: Agni, here in its aspect as the sun.
Speech:vac. The correspondence between Agni (devata) and vac (sense organ) is common: cf. BU II, 5, 3 ( § VI 6) and CU III, 18, 2, where we find the exact correspondences: speech-fire, breath-air, eye -sun, ear-regions of space.
25. Another instance of asking questions beyond the proper limits of the question (cf. also BU III, 6).
26. Cf. § VI 5
28. Cf. § VI 3.
v) Cf. the fourfold division of the primordial Man, purusa (I 5). Vac is here one quarter of brahman on the individual level, as Agni is on the cosmic level. Again the close correlation between vac and agni (or jyotis, light in general).
vi) The Word is the key to all human knowledge.
Cf. the complete CU VII (§ VI 3) and the corresponding notes regarding the main terms used here.
Fire: tejas, light, splendor, glory.
What is right and wrong: dharmam cadharmam ca.
Truth and untruth: satyam canrtam ca.
Good and evil: sadhu na asadhu.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

THE WORD - Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam

"ayam nijah paro veththi gananam laghuchethasam ! udhara charithaanam thu vasudhaiva kutumbakam !!"

The world is one family

*

Are we tired of selfish motives ? then the above aphorism exhorts us to rise above the baser ego-centric desires !
*

What is the reason behind this insatiable thirst for personal gains and becoming oblivious of others in our daily dealings with outer world ?
*

Dullness, heedlessness and illusion -the symptoms of "Tamas" veil our discriminating capacity and makes us "Laghu Chetasam"
*

As the wheel of action excludes none ,let not fruit of action be exclusively for "I/Me " but let it be shared by all of us like the kith and kin of the one human family on this planet. By so doing the word "Vasudhaiva kutumbakam "will become true to the sense of the term ...

SOME BASIC INDIAN VALUES

"asato maa sadgamaya; tamaso maa jyotirgamaya; mrityor maa amritamgamaya“,
Meaning
"Lead me from unreality to reality; from darkness to brightness; from mortality
to immortality.”
Man, in a state of ignorance (avidya) thinks he is unreal, in darkness all the time and mortal. These conceptions are wrong. Man is Satchidaananda that is Sat- (reality) Chid (having intellectual and mental faculties, therefore capable of realising his true nature) and Anand always in a state of bliss and therefore not mortal.
The purpose of all education is the gathering of knowledge. This knowledge should be directed towards the realisation of the self as explained above. The only literature in the world that has an accurate definition of "education" is the Sanskrit literature.The Chandogya Upanishad says
" SAA VIDHYAA YAA VIMUKTHAYE' Means
"Education is that which liberates".
You ask, liberate from what. The answer: liberates man from human wants. The wants are of three kinds, physical, intellectual and emotional. In the language of the Vedas, Aadhyatmika,Aadhibhouthika and Aadhidaivika. If you assess the contents of the modern education, you find that it fails to release man from these wants. One seldom is able to fulfill his wants with a modern education. So what is wrong? Swami Vivekananda said, we need a man-making education. Our system makes monsters out of men, greedy all the time, competitiveness all the time, no holistic approach to life, and drives to consider the rest of the world as an enemy and an obstacle in the realization of his wants. Inter-personal skills of communication, inter-action, and group activities are rendered to a secondary place or ignored altogether. Therefore, a close second look is required to be made to the contents of our educational system at all levels. The system does not promote the idea of VASUDHAIVA KUTUMBAKAM as Sage Vyasa said (the world as one family).
The Lalitha Sahasranamam says VIMARSAROOPINI VIDHYAA meaning "education that helps
to discriminate - between pair of opposites such as learning and ignorance, good and
bad, virtue and vice, good and evil, right and wrong. If we analyse our lives, we find that the dichotomy is always one of discriminating and choosing the right course. In the process, we make mistakes, some of them fatal ones. Therefore, education should have the primary purpose of educating to discriminate and be able to choose the right course.
The ancient Guru Kula system stressed these aspects. The Guru and the Sishya perceived everything, be it thought, word or action in the same manner. So the Vedas said –SAM GHACHHADWAM, SAMVADADHWAM, SAMVO MANAMSI JAANATHAHA
Meaning "Let us walk together, talk together, and act with one mind”.
The problem to-day in most societies is people talk at each other, they conspire against each other they walk apart and in opposite directions. This is true of individuals, societies and nations. We see conflicts arising, be it Afghanistan, Iraq or Bosnia. All Vedic-learning starts with the Saanthipaatam SAM NO MITRA SAM VARUNAHA ... meaning let the Gods protect us together, the emphasis is very much on the togetherness of the teacher and the taught. The Upanishads supplemented this idea
saying – SAMAANAAH VA AAKOOTHIHI SAMAANAA HRIDAYANI VAHAH
MEANING LET OUR OUTLOOK ON EVERYTHING BE THE SAME, LET OUR HEARTS FEEL THE SAME
EVERY TIME. Such was the quality of teachers and students at one time in history!
In a modern context, where do we place the teacher in the system? This is a perennial question, debated at length without much advantage. Once again, Sage Vyasa gives the answer. Says-
AACHARDAD PAADHAMADHATTE PAADHAM SISHYAHA SWAMEDHAYAA
PAADHAM SABRAHMACHAARIBHYAHA PAADHAM KAALAKRAMENACHA
meaning One-fourth is learnt from the teacher, one fourth by oneself at home, one-fourth from inter-action with fellow-students. The remaining one-fourth can only be learnt in course of time, from experience of oneself or of others.
Therefore, the influence of teachers was very limited. But what we find in modern societies is the readiness with which parents blame the teachers for everything bad about the pupil. If the child does not perform adequately, the school and the teachers are hauled up. It is in this context that Parent teacher
interactions, group activities of students, exposing students to first-hand experiences of life's problems become much relevant and contributing to the growth of the personality of the individual. Human personality development should be main concern of the educational system where a person spends almost a quarter of his life, in preparation for the rest of the life. If this is wasted or misdirected, how can we ensure development? To summarise, we need a system, where the human being is the focus and whatever is done by way of educational effort is to enrich him, endow him with the tools to face life as a social being, as a USEFUL MEMBER OF A LARGER GROUP

Sunday, June 29, 2008

THE WORD SACRIFICE --- IN HINDUISM!

SACRIFICE.....

An examination of the Vedas reveals that sacrifice is spoken of as the only means of salvation. “Prathamani Dharmani”; “Sacrifices are the foremost of our first duties.”



“Yagnovai Bhuvanasya Nabhih”- “Sacrifice is the mainstay of the world”.



“Yagne Sarvam Pratishthitam” – “It is sacrifice that bestows all things”.



“Yagnovai Sutarmanowh”- “Sacrifice is the bark (boat) that enables one to live well”.



“Yagnena Va Deva Divangatah” – “Only by means of sacrifice, the gods attained heaven”



“Rutasyanah Pathanaya Ati Viswani Durita”- “Deliverance through the path of sacrifice”



The above doctrines proclaimed by the Vedas emphasize that sacrifices should be the foremost of all penances that must be performed for the atonement of sins.

Let us also see what the Bhagavad Gita says:

Slo. “Sahayagnah Prajasrushtva Purovacha Prajapatih Anena Prasavishyadhwam Eshavvostvishta Kamadukh” – “In the beginning alone, along with the creation of man, God instituted the sacrifice, and told them, “May this grant the desires of your heart”

“Yagnakshapitakalmashah” – “Those whose sins have been effaced by means of sacrifice”

“Nayam lokostyayagnasvah kutanayah kurusattama” – “Oh, noble Guru, there is no place in this world for him who does not perform even a single one of these sacrifices; how then shall he obtain heaven?”

In this manner, the importance of sacrifice is taught.

Further, in the Mundakopanishad, we see, “Plava hyere adrudhayagnarapah” – “The timbers of the bark of sacrifice are unsound”.

In Skanda Puranam Yagna Vaibhava Khandam, 7th chapter, we read:

Slo. “Plava eyete sura yagna adrudhasheha na samshayah” – “Ye gods, sacrifices are like the timbers of a bark; there is no doubt that they are unsound”

Tandya Maha Brahmanam says, Sru: “Yagnota avati tasyachhaya kriyate” – “It is a sacrifice that saves. What is being performed, is the shadow of sacrifice”.

In Rig Veda, we read, Sru: “Atmada baladah yasya chhaya-mrutam yasya mruatyuh” – “He whose shadow and death become nectar shall, by his shadow and death, confer the spirit and strength”.

The above sayings clearly reveal that the sacrifices performed do not themselves confer salvation but they are the type and the shadow of a great salvation-giving sacrifice.

Aitareya Brahmanam says, Sru: “Yaja-manah pashuh yajamanameva suvargam lokam gamayati” – “He who offers the sacrificial animal; therefore, he who performs sacrifices goes to heaven”

In the Satpatha Brahmanam, we read, “Prajapatir yagnah” – “God Himself is the sacrifice”.

In Tandya Maha Brahmanam of Sama Veda, we read, Sru: “Prajapatir devebhyam atmanam yagnam krutva prayachhat” – “God would offer Himself as a sacrifice and obtain atonement for sins”

Satapadha Brahmanam says, “Tasya prajapatirardhameva martyamasidardhamrutam” – God became half mortal and half immortal”. This means that He united in Himself the human and the divine.

In the Purusha Sukta, we read that the God Brahma is sacrificed. What is evident from the above teachings is that the true and great redeeming sacrifice would be the one performed by the Sovereign Lord of this world, who putting on both mortality and immortality and becoming incarnate as God-man, would Himself be the sacrificial animal and offer Himself as a sacrifice to redeem mankind from their sins.

This is what the Rig Veda says about the sacrificial animal:

I. It must be a goat without blemish

II. The “balusu” bush must be placed round its head;

III.It must be bound to a sacrificial post.

IV. Nails must be driven into its four legs till they bleed.

V. The cloth covering the goat should be divided among the four priests.

VI. None of its bones must be broken.

VII. The goat should be given a drink of Soma juice.

VIII. After it has been slain, it must be restored to life again.

IX.Its flesh should be eaten.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

My best loved quotes from the Rig on AGNI -

Victorious Agni, grant us wealth with wisdom, wealth with brave sons, famous and independent,
Which not a foe who deals in magic conquers............

Guard us, O Agni, from the hated demon, guard us from malice of the churlish sinner:
Allied with thee may I subdue assailants.

This is that Agni, served in many places, whom the rich lord who brings oblation kindles,
And round him goes the priest at sacrifices.


O KING, the potent and terrific envoy, kindled for strength, is manifest in beauty.
He shines, all−knowing, with his lotty splendour: chasing black Night he comes with white−rayed Morning.
2 Having o'ercome the glimmering Black with beauty, and bringing forth the dame the Great Sire's Daughter,
Holding aloft the radiant light of Surya, as messenger of heaven he shines with treasures.
3 Attendant on the Blessed Dame the Blessed hath come: the Lover followeth his Sister.
Agni, far−spreading with conspicuous lustre, hath compassed Night with whitelyshining garments.
4 His goings−forth kindle as 'twere high voices the goings of the auspicious Friend of Agni.


1. THIS is that Agni, he by whose protection, favour, and help. the singer is successful;
Who with the noblest flames of glowing fuel comes forth encompassed with far−spreading lustre.
2 Agni, the Holy One, the everlasting, who shines far beaming with celestial splendours;


1. O AGNI, shared by all men living bring us good luck for sacrifice from earth and heaven.
With us be thine intelligence, WonderWorker! Protect us, God, with thy far−reaching blessings.
2 These hymns brought forth for thee, O Agni, laud thee for bounteous gifts, with cattle and with horses.
Good Lord, when man from thee hath gained enjoyment, by hymns, O noblyborn, hath he obtained it.
3 Agni I deem my Kinsman and my Father, count him my Brother and my Friend for ever.
I honour as the face of lofty Agni in heaven the bright and holy light of Surya.
4 Effectual, Agni, are our prayers for profit. He whom, at home thou, Priest for ever, guardest
Is rich in food, drawn by red steeds, and holy: by day and night to him shall all be pleasant.
5 Men with their arms have generated Agni, helpful as some kind friend, adorned with splendours,
And stablished as Invoker mid the people the ancient Priest the sacrifice's lover.
6 Worship, thyself, O God, the Gods in heaven: what, void of knowledge, shall the fool avail thee?
As thou, O God, hast worshipped Gods by seasons, so, nobly−born! to thine own self pay worship.
7 Agni, be thou our Guardian and Protector bestow upon us life and vital vigour.
Accept, O Mighty One, the gifts we offer, and with unceasing care protect our bodies.


4 O Agni, what thou deemest wealth, Victorious and Immortal One!
Bring thou to give us vigour,−at your glad carouse −splendid at sacrifices. Thou art waxing great.
5 Skilled in all lore is Agni, he whom erst Atharvan brought to life.
He was Vivasvan's envoy, at your glad carouse−the weIl−loved friend of Yama, Thou art waxing great.
6 At sacrifices they adore thee, Agni, when the rite proceeds.
All fair and lovely treasures−at your glad carouse−thou givest him who offers. Thou art waxing great.
7 Men, Agni, have established thee as welcome Priest at holy rites,
Thee whose face shines with butter,−at your glad carouse−bright, with eyes most observant. Thou art waxing
great.
8 Wide and aloft thou spreadest thee, O Agni, with tby brilliant flame.
A Bull art thou when bellowing,−at your glad carouse−thou dost impregn the Sisters. Thou art waxing great.


1. I LAUD your Mighty One who joyeth in the juice, him who is shared by all men, who created all;
Indra, whose conquering strength is powerful in war, whose fame and manly vigour Heaven and Earth revere.
2 He with his friend is active, lauded, good to man, Indra who must be glorified by one like me.
Hero, Lord of the brave, all cars are thy delight, warring with Vrtra, or for waters, or for spoil.
3 Who are the men whom thou wilt further, Indra, who strive to win thy bliss allied with riches?
Who urged thee forward to exert thy power divine, to valour, in the war for waters on their fields?
4 Thou, Indra, through the holy prayer art mighty, worthy of sacrifice at all libations.
In every fight thou castest heroes on the ground: thou art the noblest song, O Lord of all the folk.
5 Help now, as Highest, those who toil at sacrifice: well do the people know thy great protecting might.
Thou shalt be Everlasing, Giver of success yea, on all these libations thou bestowest strength.
6 All these libations thou makest effectual, of which thou art thyself supporter, Son of Power.
Therefore thy vessel is to be esteemed the best, sacrifice, holy text, prayer, and exalted speech.
7 They who with flowing Soma pray to thee, O Sage, to pour on them thy gifts of opulence and wealth,
May they come forward, through their spirit, on the path of bliss, in the wild joy of Soma juice effused.


1. THOU, mighty Agni, gatherest up all that is precious for thy friend.
Bring us all treasures as thou art enkindled in libation's place
2 Assemble, speak together: let your minds be all of one accord,
As ancient Gods unanimous sit down to their appointed share.
3 The place is common, common the assembly, common the mind, so be their thought united.
A common purpose do I lay before you, and worship with your general oblation.
4 One and the same bt your resolve, and be your minds of one accord.
United be the thoughts of all that all may happily agree.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

YET ANOTHER STUNNING RELIGIOUS LEADER - RAMANUJAM
Ramanuja: Encyclopedia II - Ramanuja - Visishtadvaita philosophy
Ramanuja - Visishtadvaita philosophy
Ramanuja's philosophy is referred to as Vishishtadvaita because it combines Advaita (oneness of God) with Vishesha (attributes). The philosophy is monotheistic.
Ramanuja - God alone exists
Brahman is the only thing that exists. Everything else is simply a manifestation of Brahman. Brahman to Ramanuja was Narayana.
Ramanuja - Differences with Sankara
Adi Sankara had argued that all qualities or manifestations that can be perceived are unreal and temporary. They are a result of ignorance. Ramanuja believed them to be real and permanent and under the control of the Brahman. God can be one despite the existence of attributes, because they cannot exist alone; they are not independent entities. They are Prakaras or the modes, Sesha or the accessories, and Niyama or the controlled aspects, of the one Brahman.
In Sri Ramanuja’s system of philosophy, the Lord (Narayana) has two inseparable Prakaras or modes, viz., the world and the souls. These are related to Him as the body is related to the soul. They have no existence apart from Him. They inhere in Him as attributes in a substance. Matter and souls constitute the body of the Lord. The Lord is their indweller. He is the controlling Reality. Matter and souls are the subordinate elements. They are termed Viseshanas, attributes. God is the Viseshya or that which is qualified.
History shows that the followers of sankara are answerless till date to the strong arguments of ramanuja(in his sri bhashya) and his followers(satadushani of desika,...). In a bid to escape strong objections raised by ramanuja and his successors, most advaitins take a disguised route of neo vedantism, where they argue that vaishnavism is one another path to realise brahman. Ironically, the very brahman of ramanuja and sankara are different.
ramanuja opines, wrong is the position of the Advaitins that understanding the Upanishads without knowing and practicing dharma can result in Brahman knowledge. The knowledge of Brahman that ends spiritual ignorance is meditational, not (as Advaitins seem to presume) testimonial or verbal.
In contrast to sankara, ramanuja holds, There is no knowledge source in support of the claim that there is a distinctionless (homogeneous) Brahman. All knowledge sources reveal objects as distinct from other objects. All experience reveals an object known in some way or other beyond mere existence. Testimony depends on the operation of distinct sentence parts (words with distinct meanings). Thus the claim that testimony makes known that reality is distinctionless is contradicted by the very nature of testimony as a knowledge means. Even the simplest perceptual cognition reveals something (Bessie) as qualified by something else (a broken hoof, “Bessie has a broken hoof,” as known perceptually). Inference depends on perception and makes the same distinct things known as does perception.
Against the Advaita contention that perception cannot make known distinctness but only homogeneous being since distinctness cannot be defined, well, sorry, perception makes known generic characters (cowhood and the like) that differentiate things. If what you Advaitins say were true, why should not a person looking for a horse be satisfied with a buffalo? Remembering could not be distinguished from perceiving, because there would be only the one object (being). And no one would be deaf or blind. Furthermore, Brahman would be an object of perception and the other sources (prameya).
He also holds, The Advaitin argument about prior absences and no prior absence of consciousness is wrong. Similarly the Advaitin understanding of a-vidya (not-Knowledge), which is the absence of spiritual knowledge, is incorrect. “If the distinction between spiritual knowledge and spiritual ignorance is unreal, then spiritual ignorance and the self are one.”
Ramanuja picks out what he sees as seven fundamental flaws in the Advaita philosophy for special attack: he sees them as so fundamental to the Advaita position that if he is right in identifying them as involving doctrinal contradictions, then Sankara's entire system collapses. He argues:
I. The nature of Avidya. Avidya must be either real or unreal; there is no other possibility. But neither of these is possible. If Avidya is real, non-dualism collapses into dualism. If it is unreal, we are driven to self-contradiction or infinite regress.
II. The incomprehensibility of Avidya. Advaitins claim that Avidya is neither real nor unreal but incomprehensible, {anirvacaniya.} All cognition is either of the real or the unreal: the Advaitin claim flies in the face of experience, and accepting it would call into question all cognition and render it unsafe.
III. The grounds of knowledge of Avidya. No pramana can establish Avidya in the sense the Advaitin requires. Advaita philosophy presents Avidya not as a mere lack of knowledge, as something purely negative, but as an obscuring layer which covers Brahman and is removed by true Brahma-vidya. Avidya is positive nescience not mere ignorance. Ramanuja argues that positive nescience is established neither by perception, nor by inference, nor by scriptural testimony. On the contrary, Ramanuja argues, all cognition is of the real.
IV. The locus of Avidya. Where is the Avidya that gives rise to the (false) impression of the reality of the perceived world? There are two possibilities; it could be Brahman's Avidya or the individual soul's {jiva.} Neither is possible. Brahman is knowledge; Avidya cannot co-exist as an attribute with a nature utterly incompatible with it. Nor can the individual soul be the locus of Avidya: the existence of the individual soul is due to Avidya; this would lead to a vicious circle.
V. Avidya's obscuration of the nature of Brahman. Sankara would have us believe that the true nature of Brahman is somehow covered-over or obscured by Avidya. Ramanuja regards this as an absurdity: given that Advaita claims that Brahman is pure self-luminous consciousness, obscuration must mean either preventing the origination of this (impossible since Brahman is eternal) or the destruction of it - equally absurd.
VI. The removal of Avidya by Brahma-vidya. Advaita claims that Avidya has no beginning, but it is terminated and removed by Brahma-vidya, the intuition of the reality of Brahman as pure, undifferentiated consciousness. But Ramanuja denies the existence of undifferentiated {nirguna} Brahman, arguing that whatever exists has attributes: Brahman has infinite auspicious attributes. Liberation is a matter of Divine Grace: no amount of learning or wisdom will deliver us.
VII. The removal of Avidya. For the Advaitin, the bondage in which we dwell before the attainment of Moksa is caused by Maya and Avidya; knowledge of reality (Brahma-vidya) releases us. Ramanuja, however, asserts that bondage is real. No kind of knowledge can remove what is real. On the contrary, knowledge discloses the real; it does not destroy it. And what exactly is the saving knowledge that delivers us from bondage to Maya? If it is real then non-duality collapses into duality; if it is unreal, then we face an utter absurdity.
Ramanuja - Caste system
He was critical of the caste system. He said, "Does the wearing of a sacred thread make one a Brahmin? One who is devoted to God (Narayana) alone is a Brahmin."

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Agni is a god of fire, he is the very essence of fire, and fire is the essence of life. All the main processes in your body: breathing, digesting and entire metabolism is a form of burning reaction. Recite Agni mantra to improve dissimulation in your body, work of all organs and for overall vitality. Combine this mantra with some exercise to loose wait fast and in the most spiritual way. Energy of fire correspond to vision and eyes, so this mantra will improve your sight.
Fire has a special meaning in life. When you are full of fire, or passion, you posses that brilliant energy that attracts luck and makes you a winner. Veda say : "Through Agni one may win wealth, and grow from day to day, glorious and most abounding in heroic sons", 1.1.3 Inner fire gives you magnetic beauty, beautiful complexion and perfect body. Agni is called a flash-eating fire, representing metabolism in the body and purification from toxins. Hot spices carry the energy of fire, you can add them into your diet, but be careful, don't burn yourself out completely. He is a purifier of the subtle energy around and within you.
Fire needs two things to exist: fuel, that is, food in case of body and oxygen. To maintain a good, healthy fire the balance between two have to be kept. Too much food, not enough air or inability to spend the excessive energy cause fire to go bad or stagnant. Excess of "bad" or stale fire in your body will cause anger, impatience, jealousy, bad temper, eating disorders and problems with heart and kidneys. Metabolism that is too intensive will burn too much fat and it will be difficult for you to gain weight. Before you eat your food, make an offering to your personal Agni, that represented by acid in your digestive tract. Offer the food you about to eat to him to make sure he will accept it , that is, digest it well. If he will not, you'll end up with fat that will be very difficult to get rid off. Problems with too much acid result from eccessive fire of from foods that you personal Agni would not accept. Therefore, you have to be sensible about your food and communicate to your inner fire before you eat to make sure this would be the right food. Too much fire in your body can result not only as burning sensations in your digestive tract, but as bad temper, irritate, rushing and laud appearance. You will notice that people like this are usually fat as well. This is a typical Agni disorder, being "fat and furious". If you have such disorder, get in touch with your inner fire and balance it with help of Agni Gayatri.
You can extinguish too much fire and bring it to balance with other elements in your body by adding water (see Varuna Gayatri). Take cool shower, drink some water or recite a Varuna mantra. Another way to control fire is to bring more air element in your body through conscious breathing exercises, jugging outdoors or yoga. Air feeds fire, that burns the toxins and leave you pure and calm. Good fire is a laughter and sparkles in your eyes.You'll be able to play with your fire safely, using it for positive purposes: to gain beauty, money and success.
Fire have very important ritual significance of purification in every occasions of life or death. In both ancient Hindu and Slavic traditions, cremation was the way dead people was purified, the soul is freed to go to heaven. By means of fire, the remainings of the body were given back to sky, earth or water the elements it came from. When Indian couple get married, they go around the fire 7 times hand to hand, this ritual symbolizes their new union that begins pure.
In esoteric perspective, Agni is a messenger between Gods and people, and the god of Sacrifice. By means of fire communication between Gods and people is made easy in every culture - that's why we burn candle when we pray in church or home, during pagan festivals or making a magic spell. The Rig Veda denotes: "only that one (Agni) goes to the Gods"So, Agni is a messenger between people and God. When Agni becomes a priest, the messenger - his robes are both the flames and prayers. His parents are sky and earth, he is also considered to be a grandson of waters- because trees born from water and fire born from trees. So, they say, Agni is born in the water, wearing garment of gold, he give riches to his worshippers.
The Mundaka Upanishads says "The dancing flames of the sacred fire are seven: the black, the terrific, that which is swift in mind, that which is dark with smoke, the deep red, the spark-blazing and the luminous omniformed flame." And than it gives some technical details: "If a man begins his sacrifice when the flames are luminous, than the holy offerings lead him on the rays of the sun where the Lord of all Gods has his high dwelling". In other words, if you want your wishes to reach heaven and be heard, offer into the luminous flames. Now, when you want to invoke other kind of forces, offer to the black or the terrific flames, but remember: what you create will hit you back. "Unsafe are the eighteen books where the lower actions are explained". Evil wishes will be granted, but this path leads to hell.
Pray to Agni if you need your message to be delivered to any other God effectively. When Agni is pleased, you and Gods have a "good fire" - and they bring us what we wish for. So, this communication has tree aspects: between you and fire, or Agni, between fire and Gods, and between you and Gods when they rejoice from good fire. All rites of worship in India begin with the worship to Fire God first to ensure successful ceremony. Worshiping Agni along is a form of very powerful magic.
Vishnu Puran claims that Agni is the eldest son of Brahma. His wife is Svaha, that correspond to the word Amen in catholic prayers, that send every prayer to heaven - just like by means of fire your offerings and prayers are sent to God.

OM agniM taM manye yo vasurastaM yaM yanti dhenavaH. astamarvanta AshavostaM nityAso vAjina iSaM stotR^ibhya Abhara. OM (Rig. 5-6-1)
Om. Our salutations and prostrations to the Holy Prophet Rishi Vasushruta Atreya. Om.
Om. I believe that to be Agni, in which everything lives, in which all the cows, swift horses and the eternal vaajins (fires or rays1), enter. O Agni! Bring us the desired wealth (Supreme Knowledge). Om.Compare with the statement of Taittiriya Upanishad 3-1, "From which everything evolves, in which everything exists and in which everything enters, try to know that, indeed that is Brahman."

OM A mandrasya saniSyanto vareNyaM vR^iNImahe ahrayaM vAjamR^igmiyam.rAtiM bhR^igUNAmushijaM kavikratumagniM rAjantaM divyena shociSA. OM (Rig. 3-2-4)
Om. Our salutations and prostrations to the Holy Prophet Rishi Vishvaamitra Gaathina. Om. Wishing the food (knowledge), which is related to the laudable omnipresent, is desirable, is not bashful, we adore Agni, who is glowing with divine glow, is omniscient, is the only desirable one and is the bestower (of knowledge) to the sons of Rishi Brigu. Om.

1
OM apa naH shoshucadaghamagne shushugdhyA rayim.apa naH shoshucadagham. OM (Rig. 1-97-1)
Om. Our salutations and prostrations to the Holy Prophet Rishi Kutsa Angirasa. OmOm. O Agni! Burn our sins. Enlighten our true wealth. Burn our sins. Om.

NOW LOOK INTO THE BIBLE FOR FIRE OR AGNI
The average Christian, as their first choice, would not associate the word "fire" with the Creator Himself. Our first thoughts would probably be Hell-fire, the Lake of Fire, or Sodom and Gomorra. It may be surprising to many Christians that the word "fire," and its attributes of "light" and "heat," speak more of the Creator and His goodness than of a destructive force against His enemies.
Clearly, the writers of the Bible employed the use of fire in many different ways. However, when it came to the spiritual use of fire, they usually attributed fire to God. Yahweh manifested Himself in various forms of fire on many different occasions. We find some of these manifestations in the making of the Covenant with Abraham (Gen. 15:17), the burning bush (Exo. 3:2-4), pillar of fire (Exo. 13:21), on Sinai (Exo.19:18), in the flame on the altar (Judg. 13:20), and Yahweh answering by fire (1 Kings 18:24, 38).
Sacrifices and offerings (including incense which represented the prayers of the people) were to be made by fire. (Exo. 12:8,9,10; Lev. 1) Fire often meant the acceptance of a sacrifice by Yahweh (Judges 6:21; 1 Kin. 18:38; 1 Chr. 21:26). Leviticus 9:24 tells us that the sacrificial fire "came forth from Yahweh." The fire on the altar was to be continually burning. (Lev. 6:12,13)
Fire came down from heaven at the consecration of Solomon’s Temple. Yahweh said He would dwell there "forever" according to the King James Bible, yet we know the Temple was destroyed and the fire put out. Did Yahweh lie? Is the Bible in error?
The fire on the altar, according to many Bible translations, was to be an "everlasting" fire, but was extinguished a few centuries later. (2 Chr. 7:1) There were many things called "everlasting" in the Old Testament which no longer exist or were done away with by the New Testament. The reason why some Bibles "appear" to have contradictions stems from the incorrect translation of the Hebrew word "olam" and its counterpart in the New Testament "aion." These words indicate "an indefinite period of time," not "everlasting." We have lengthy studies on these words for those interested in pursuing the subject.
While Yahweh’s answer by fire was usually a positive act, there were times when His manifestation in fire, or the use of fire, was used as a correction or destruction of evil (Gen. 19:24, Sodom and Gomorra; Ex. 9:23; Num. 11:1; Num. 16:35; Psalm 104:4; Lev 20:14; Lev. 21:9; Josh .7:25).
Fire is also figuratively used of Yahweh’s glory (Dan 7:9), of His holiness (Isa. 33:14), of His protection of His people (2 Kings 6:17; Zec. 2:5), of His jealousy for His sole worship (Deut. 4:24; Heb. 12:29; Ps. 79:5), of His wrath (Deut. 9:3; Ps. 18:8; Ps. 89:46; Isa. 5:24), of His Word in power (Jer. 5:14; Jer. 23:29), of Divine truth (Ps. 39:3; Jer. 20:9; Lk. 12:49), of that which guides men (Isa. 50:10-11), of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:3), of Christ in His glory (Rev 1:14), of the power of love to overcome evil (Rom. 12:20), of trial and suffering (Ps. 66:12; Isa 43:2; 1 Peter 1:7; 1 Peter 4:12), of evil (Prov. 6:27; Isa 9:18; Isa. 65:5), of lust or desire (Hos. 7:6; 1 Cor. 7:9), of greed (Prov. 30:16), of the evil tongue (James 3:5-6), of heaven and its purity and glory (Rev. 15:2; Rev 21:22-23), and of Divine testing for divinity (Rev. 20). I am sure I have not exhausted the list of the various ways fire is used in the Bible. If we studied light and heat (attributes of fire), I’m sure we could greatly expand the list.
It is not surprising that fire plays such a significant role in the Bible. The Creator Himself is described as a "consuming fire." (Dan. 4:24; Heb. 12:29) Doesn’t it seem rather strange to our understanding to call the Creator a consuming fire? Rarely, if ever, do we associate fire with the creation process. We usually associate it with destruction.
Fire has played perhaps one of the most significant roles in the advancement of civilization. Practically no manufacturing would be possible apart from the use of fire to break down and shape materials for our use. Our very lives depend upon the energy given by the biggest fire near the earth, the sun.
I believe, in order to understand our English Bible translation, we must know something about the culture of the people who wrote the original in their native languages. Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek are highly figurative, extremely expressive languages, full of many kinds of idiomatic expressions and figures of speech. The customs of the Semitic peoples in particular are quite foreign to the Western mind. We must understand how they used the word "fire" if we are to understand the meaning of the word "fire" in the Bible.
Fire, is first and foremost, a symbol of divinity in the Semitic Middle East. It is a symbol of Yahweh Himself. God manifesting in physical fire could be a favorable judgment as when He came to consecrate Solomon’s Temple or a negative judgment as when He swallowed up Aaron’s son for offering up "strange fire." Being creatures quick to become fearful, we have a tendency to dwell on the negative side of things and so usually associate divine fire with wrath. (Lev. 10:1) This has been a serious mistake of the church throughout much of its existence.
It is interesting to note that the more judgmental, vengeful, legalistic, ritualistic, and fundamental one is, the more likely they are to see fire as God’s punishment. They have a difficult time seeing fire as a positive symbol of God. For this mindset, fire usually means Hell, the lake of fire, and everlasting punishment. On the other hand, the more loving, merciful, and compassionate one has become, the more likely they are to see fire as a symbol of love, zeal, and sacredness. They are "on fire for God" is an expression used in a positive sense. The judgmental person will usually see fire away from themselves, out in the future somewhere awaiting those whom it would swallow up in judgment, its flames flickering like the tongue of a snake sensing the air for the smell of those whom it will eternally torment or annihilate.

When Yahweh expressed His desire to be among the children of Israel, He manifested as smoke and fire. He said He wanted to speak with them. One would think it a great honor and privilege to be chosen to hear from God. But mankind in its lower nature, whether in ancient days or the present, will always respond as Israel did. They wanted Moses to speak with Him, "lest they die." Yesterday, God’s people put Moses between themselves and God. Today we use the Bible, or other church leadership as our excuse for not letting God in our midst "lest "WE" die.
Christians who have allowed the fire of God to enter the very recesses of their lives will see His fire in a totally different light. Rather than being utterly destroyed by the fire, they are purified, corrected, cleansed. God’s fire within brings forth a love that desires to bring healing and restoration to all mankind. The more spiritually minded, desirous to be changed, and willing to be conformed to the image of Christ one is, the less fear they have of fire in the Bible. The latter group is more likely to use the word "fire" in a positive sense. I think the latter group is also more likely to be spiritually alive.
What does natural fire do? It usually takes dense matter composed of different atoms and breaks them apart into simpler elements, usually gases. Have you ever noticed that flames naturally flicker upward, higher? It is the gases ignited which produce the flame.
Fire produces flame (light) and heat, two very useful properties in the natural world. The more we seem to understand the scientific properties of fire, the more useful fire seems to become to mankind. Science and the business community are finding all kinds of uses for the energy waves which come forth from fire, whether the fire is from the sun, or from the splitting of an atom, or other sources. Could the incredible uses of light, such as the laser, be natural signs of what may lay ahead regarding the spiritual fire to which Jesus pointed?
As long as mankind uses fire as instruments of destruction, cruelty, or as in the case of Nazi Germany, to extinguish unwanted people, mankind will continue to have an unhealthy fear of fire. The atomic bomb has certainly been an instrument which strikes at the fear in the heart of mankind. In addition, our technology is not perfect. Fire accidents often produce horrible disasters. This also instills fear of fire. The more we use fire for good and the better we are able control it, the more comfortable we will be with fire and the less fear we will have of it.
When we center on using fire for the good of all mankind, we will be able to use this very force to turn this world into a paradise again. But first, the fire of the heart needs to be kindled. The fire that Jesus would kindled is the fire of good works poured out as coal upon our enemies heads. (Matt. 5:38-48, Rom 12:20) This is the fire which will bring righteous judgment into this world. In the same context, Jesus spoke of praying for your enemies. The incense and coals offered up each day in the Tabernacles and Temples of the Old Testament symbolized this act. We Christians have the privilege of offering up these prayers to our Father each day of our lives. (Please note, these prayers are offered up for our enemies, those who take advantage of us and mock us.
The colder Christian seeks the fire of vengeance, the fire of God’s wrath, yet the Bible tells us when His judgments are in the earth we will learn righteousness. The colder Christian believes his enemies will get an eternal flame of wrath which will never be quenched. Yet the Scriptures tell us God will not always be wrath. (Isa. 57:16) He did, however, say His mercy endures "forever" in 26 places in one single Psalm. (1 Chron. 16:34; Ps. 100:5; Ps. 136) As a matter of fact, it seems almost as if mercy and judgment are in a battle with each other, with mercy ultimately winning out over judgment. "Mercy will triumph over judgment." (James 2:13, NKJV) This word "triumph" or "rejoice over" (Gr. Katakauchaomai) actually means "boast over" or "exalt over" as in a victory in a battle.
Jesus said He came to send fire on the earth and He yearned for it to be kindled. (Luke 12:49) Many Christians today yearn for God to judge the earth by destroying it with physical fire. Is this what Jesus was yearning for?
The book of Acts records for us the first fruits of that fire for which Jesus yearned. Discover for yourselves the effects His kind of fire has on the world. Tongues of fire came upon the 120 which drove them into the streets of Jerusalem. The tongues of fire caused them to open their mouths which were previously shut by the fear of man. And what did they declare? The WONDERFUL works of God! And what was the result? Three thousand were added unto them. Do you find it a coincidence that when Moses’ Law was given under a fiery mountain, three thousand Israelites were killed? But when the Law of the Life in Christ Jesus was made manifest under a different kind of fire in the "upper" room, three thousand were added unto them!? (Ex. 32:28; Acts 2:41) Both laws were connected with fire. One brought fear, wrath, and death; the other brought liberty, forgiveness, and Life.
The church still mixes the two laws or covenants. This means another fire must come to "divide" this abominable mixture. Malachi speaks of a fire to "purge" the sons of Levi. The early church often referred to a "purifying" fire. There are nearly 2 billion people on the earth espousing the name of "Christian" who have certainly mixed thousands of creeds, rituals, doctrines, laws, traditions to the simplicity of the pure light of the gospel. Only divine fire will be able to separate the vile from the holy. Surely, another fire will come into the house of God! Surely judgment begins in the house of the Lord! The priests are always cleansed first, then the people. Yet much of the modern church is expecting to fly away soon, while the earth receives a fire of wrath.
How is it that there is always a large contingency in the church who blast out the same words and spirit John and James boldly spewed forth when the Samaritans refused to accept the Jesus as the Messiah. "Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?" And what was Jesus reply? "You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them." (Luke 9:54-56) Could we modern Christians also be as guilty of misusing fire as these disciples were?
Fire is usually started by friction or percussion, two sticks rubbing together or the striking of flint against iron. This causes a spark which produces a fire.
Fires are usually always noticed. They draw attention. Is this not also the case with the fires of anger or love? An angry person rarely keeps their anger to themselves. They are like a spark. They will usually ignite, agitate others until a conflict (fire) occurs. In the same way, one burning with love and compassion, which is like a fire, will spread God’s flames of kindness, melting the hearts of those around them.
And indeed have we not all been in a continuous battle within ourselves and our actions and thoughts toward others, wrestling with the desire for vengeance, judgment, wrath, and punishment on the one hand, while at the same time desiring an end to all of these through mercy, forgiveness, self-denial, and love for ourselves as well as others?? Both are fire. Both stir the emotions. Both stir men and women to action. One brings death; one brings life!
Fire is never static. It moves. It seeks to consume. This is true whether it be the hateful fire of man’s anger or the passion to bring healing, joy, and love to those around them. Fire always produces change. It will force one to act, to respond. Fire brings focus. "Fiery" trials often let us know which kind of fire is burning in our bosom.
Those who believe in God will usually attribute the fire in their bosoms to their God. If they are angry and bitter inside, they will often attribute their anger to God’s righteous wrath against the wicked. Likewise, a truly compassionate, loving person will usually credit God for their qualities. They know God as their source of true love.
It has only been in recent years that mankind has discovered that fire never really permanently destroys or annihilates anything. Fire just stirs up the molecules until they reach a point of agitation great enough for atoms within a molecule to be released from one another. Fire divides. The same thing happened when Jesus sent forth the fire of which He spoke. He sent forth a seed (spark) of faith which broke the power of tradition which held people together to a lower form of government. Some, through His fiery word, were released to serve in a higher kingdom, the kingdom of God in which dwelt righteousness, peace, and joy. Others stayed behind and became the ashes or remains of the Levitical System. While the Old Mosaic System was destroyed in one sense, its destruction brought forth something better, higher. This fire loosened a force which would literally change the course of mankind—agape love. Yet even the ashes if this fire found purpose in God’s marvelous plan. (Rom. chapter 11)
Prior to the destruction of Jerusalem which brought an end to the entire Levitical Priesthood and governing body of Judaism along with its regulations, Peter spoke of a time in which the "elements shall melt with fervent heat." (2 Peter 3:10) This word "elements" (stoicheion) usually referred to principles, foundations, governments, orderly structures (see a Concordance). Again, those with a higher vision, with clearer "light," see the destruction of the types and shadows of the Mosaic governmental and priestly system giving way to the New Covenant, New Priesthood, New Government, as a release to a higher reality. The scaffolding of the Old Covenant gave way to the building itself. Those with eyes to see could see a New Heaven (leadership) and a New Earth (new body) coming forth. They could see a city whose Maker is God built upon a New Foundation, the very Life of the Son of God!
Man’s systems are complicated structures composed of thousands of laws, customs, traditions and rituals from which we are not allowed to stray at the cost of ridicule, shunning, rejection, and various other forms of punishment including imprisonment and even death. These are the "elements" of mankind’s foundational structure. Unfortunately, the governing force behind all these "elements" is fear of man.
Trees (wood) speak of mankind, both individually and corporately. (Isa. 61:3, trees of righteousness) There are many Scriptures which refer to trees and branches which speak of mankind and Christ. The wood from trees can be used for all sorts of things, one of which is for burning. Did you know there are some trees which can burn and not be destroyed? (Exo. 3:2-4)
Now the Scriptures tell us that perfect love casts out fear. (1 John 4:18) This perfect love is a fire, usually not found in the political, religious, and economic powers of mankind. It is found only in Christ. And when this perfect love burns within a heart, it sets the captive free from the power of fear used by the lower forms, rudiments, principles, laws, customs, rituals, etc., which were made by men to "control" each other.
The two main trees represented in the garden of Eden are the Tree of Life, (Christ, Law of life in Christ Jesus) and the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil (Law of Moses and all other forms of human laws which governmental and religious leaders use to control mankind.) One is eternal, the other will vanish once it has served its purpose in mankind. The Tree of Life shines with Light, Life, and Love. He is the true tree of Light of which the Christmas tree is but a poor counterfeit. I have to leave this subject because it cannot be laid out in a few pages. I just wanted to stir your thinking regarding "trees" in relationship to "fire" when spoken of in the Bible.
However, those who focused then, and even this day on vengeance, whose fire in their hearts is still an "eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life,"—these will remain blind to the higher view. They will insist that the "elements" to which Peter was referring are buildings, trees, and people. They will assume the whole world will be destroyed by a physical fire such as the atomic bomb. They will spend many dollars and hundreds of hours swallowing books and tapes describing this grand event. Yet their hearts will not change.
We need not look to physical fire to see where the evil fire of mankind comes from. James tells us that the tongue is a world of iniquity that sets the course of nature on fire. Look to the bloody trail of "civilization." Was it not a fiery tongue or sharp pen filled with angry words which brought forth the rage and fear in men which brought them to the point of killing their fellow man while risking their own lives? James tells us that he who can tame the tongue which sets the course of this world on fire is a perfect man. (James 3:6) A quick survey of our planet tells us how far from perfection mankind presently is. And it is often the religious man who sets the greatest number of these kind of fires.
It seems the Lord rejoices in those who manifest His burning love. He also isn’t too upset with those hard, cold, stony hearts because they are ripe for judgment. You see, a cold person can only manifest what is in his heart. If one spends any time at all with them, it is easy to discern what spirit they are of. They may be religious, they may "appear" righteous, but their deeds will eventually give them away.
Jesus wished we were hot or cold. It was the luke-warm which He would spew out of His mouth. It is when a host of "luke-warm" gather around a cold dead religious leadership which upsets our Lord the most. There is just enough life, light, warmth in the luke-warm to attract seekers of truth. Dead and un-anointed Christian leadership have no life to give. These keep a clear distance between themselves and their congregations. This kind of religious leadership desperately depends upon luke-warm Christians to keep the system going. If the luke-warm left such organizations, the cold, emptiness of the leadership in these organizations would manifest as dead. The only thing that keeps them going is the money and time the luke-warm contribute. Luke-warm Christians give an assemblance of life to that which is in reality dead. They give power to anti-Christ.
Anti-Christ (antichristos) simply means "instead of the anointing or anointed." It is nothing more than any person, institution or teaching which substitutes itself for the living Truth. John told us there were many anti-Christs in his day. (1 John 2:18) Jesus Christ was the true Anointed One. He said He would send His Holy Spirit to be "poured out" upon others.
On the day of Pentecost the Holy Spirit fell upon the new priesthood as "tongues of fire." Here is the true separation unto priesthood under the New Covenant. Far too many enter into church leadership by other means. All of these other means are anti-Christ, a substitute for the true anointing of God. May all the luke-warm in the Christian community stop giving credence and support to the cold-hearted, un-anointed leadership of many Christian organizations and turn to the Anointing, the Fire, the Light which comes from above and not through church tradition. This probably speaks to much of the church.
Dear Lord, move us to your Love! Stir us upward! Cause us to see by your Spirit. Cause us to be moved by your compassion, your desires. Raise us up to be seated in heavenly places that we might see with the mind of Christ! Through your fiery love break us free from the bondage of corruption, from the traditions of men, that we might truly become your praise, your presence, your glory, your light, your love here on earth. Amen.
In conclusion, as man sees the need to set aside destructive use of its resources, especially fire, so too, will the heart of man begin to turn from anger, vengeance, and judgment to the hot coals to which Jesus and Paul referred. Only these coals will melt cold, hard hearts. Coals were used to burn the incense in the tabernacle. The incense was a "pleasing" fragrance to the Lord. Does He ask us to pray for His wrath to fall on our enemies heads or good works which will turn them towards Him?
We have found natural ways to increase the temperature of our fires to melt down things which were once thought impossible to melt or change in form. So too, one day our Maker will melt the stony hearts of Adam and bring forth pure gold . . . Christ in us, the hope of glory. It just takes the right kind and amount of heat.
When mankind learns to leave vengeance to God, we just might be surprised to find that even God’s vengeance, may be found to be a power to be used for the good of all mankind, and not for its destruction. There is a fire which will release all who dwell in lower natures, lower thoughts, lower visions and raise them up to where He, our Creator, becomes All in All. (1 Cor. 15:28) May more Christians rise and be seated in heavenly places wherein, it seems is nothing but fire. In Him, there is no shifting or turning. There is no change. He is the End. He is our End. And what is that? God is love! And He is truly the ALL-CONSUMING FIRE!! Hallelujah!!
Paul implores us to present our bodies a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God. We are to be consumed by Him and not be destroyed in the process. Our devotion, our zeal, our passion should be towards His purposes. It is interesting that science also uses terms which indicate there is fire in our bodies. They speak of "burning up" calories. We humans "burn up" energy as we go through our day like our cars burn up fuel. Paul beseeches us to devote our lives to God. In that way, we become the light of the world. A life devoted to Him will also make this world a warmer place to live.